Mediation Services

A STRATEGIC APPROACH;
A SUCCESSFUL RESOLUTION

Mediation & Arbitration

Case Results

All
  • All
  • Auto Accident
  • Breach of Contract
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Construction Defect
  • Employment
  • Landlord/Tenant
  • Premises Liability
  • Professional Negligence
  • Real Property

MULTI VEHICLE high speed accident in which

MULTI VEHICLE high speed accident in which 5 people were seriously injured. Issues centered on whether driver was within COURSE AND SCOPE of his employment at the time of the accident. Also involved substantial INSURANCE COVERAGE issues centering on PERMISSIVE DRIVER status and NON-LISTED VEHICLE EXCLUSION.

PEDESTRIAN V. AUTO case in which plaintiff/mail

PEDESTRIAN V. AUTO case in which plaintiff/mail carrier was hit in cross walk by defendant driver while on her usual delivery route. Plaintiff sustained injuries to both KNEES, neck, shoulder and back. Plaintiff also claimed PTSD resulting from the accident.

PERSONAL INJURY/PREMISES LIABILITY case in which plaintiff

PERSONAL INJURY/PREMISES LIABILITY case in which plaintiff fell in store after toe of shoe caught on item protruding from shelf. Plaintiff FRACTURED BONES IN FOOT and claimed to have developed arthritis as a result.

PERSONAL INJURY/UNINSURED MOTORIST/BRAIN INJURY Settled first party

PERSONAL INJURY/UNINSURED MOTORIST/BRAIN INJURY Settled first party claim in which claimant alleged TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY AND POST CONCUSSIVE SYNDROME after being hit by a drunk driver. Validity of Neuropsychological testing and competing medical evaluations were among issues contested.

Plaintiff hit by DRUNK DRIVER while in

Plaintiff hit by DRUNK DRIVER while in his car with his two children. Plaintiff claims significant PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY as a result, including PTSD and Panic Disorder.

FOUR CAR REAR END sequence freeway accident.

FOUR CAR REAR END sequence freeway accident. Plaintiff sustained injuries to neck and upper back and claimed additional injuries to shoulder and nerve in elbow thereafter. Defendants asserted that not all of injuries were related to the accident. Discussions included APPORTIONMENT OF FAULT between the three defendants.