Effective California Mediator
Case Results: Auto Accident
MOTORCYCLE VS. VEHICLE accident in which plaintiff/cyclists
MOTORCYCLE VS. VEHICLE accident in which plaintiff/cyclists sustained a WRIST FRACTURE when car collided with his motorcycle. Plaintiff made a good recovery, but may be at an increased risk of arthritis in the future
MOTORCYCLIST injured by driver while making a
MOTORCYCLIST injured by driver while making a delivery using the UBER platform. Injuries included a FOOT AND ANKLE wound that healed poorly, requiring painful and frequent DEBRIDEMENT procedures to eventually resolve. Other soft tissue injuries and bruises were also sustained.
MULTI CAR FREEWAY ACCIDENT in which defendant
MULTI CAR FREEWAY ACCIDENT in which defendant lost control in heavy weather on highway and crashed into plaintiff’s car. Plaintiff claimed EXACERBATION OF PRE- EXISTING CONDITIONS with injuries to her KNEE and SHOULDER, requiring SURGICAL INTERVENTION.
MULTI VEHICLE high speed accident in which
MULTI VEHICLE high speed accident in which 5 people were seriously injured. Issues centered on whether driver was within COURSE AND SCOPE of his employment at the time of the accident. Also involved substantial INSURANCE COVERAGE issues centering on PERMISSIVE DRIVER status and NON-LISTED VEHICLE EXCLUSION.
PEDESTRIAN V. AUTO case in which plaintiff/mail
PEDESTRIAN V. AUTO case in which plaintiff/mail carrier was hit in cross walk by defendant driver while on her usual delivery route. Plaintiff sustained injuries to both KNEES, neck, shoulder and back. Plaintiff also claimed PTSD resulting from the accident.
PERSONAL INJURY/PREMISES LIABILITY case in which plaintiff
PERSONAL INJURY/PREMISES LIABILITY case in which plaintiff fell in store after toe of shoe caught on item protruding from shelf. Plaintiff FRACTURED BONES IN FOOT and claimed to have developed arthritis as a result.
PERSONAL INJURY/UNINSURED MOTORIST/BRAIN INJURY Settled first party
PERSONAL INJURY/UNINSURED MOTORIST/BRAIN INJURY Settled first party claim in which claimant alleged TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY AND POST CONCUSSIVE SYNDROME after being hit by a drunk driver. Validity of Neuropsychological testing and competing medical evaluations were among issues contested.
Plaintiff hit by DRUNK DRIVER while in
Plaintiff hit by DRUNK DRIVER while in his car with his two children. Plaintiff claims significant PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY as a result, including PTSD and Panic Disorder.
AUTO ACCIDENT between two “on the job”
AUTO ACCIDENT between two “on the job” drivers where defendant ran a RED LIGHT. Plaintiff claims substantial injuries requiring surgery on her CERVICAL SPINE. Defendant disputed causation and severity of injuries claimed.
AUTO ACCIDENT case in which plaintiff claimed
AUTO ACCIDENT case in which plaintiff claimed to have hit her head on CAR DOOR which was damaged by side swipe collision and rebounded into her. Claims of TBI and ORTHOPEDIC injuries.
AUTO ACCIDENT case in which plaintiff sought
AUTO ACCIDENT case in which plaintiff sought damages for post concussive syndrome and related transformed migraine syndrome. Defendant disputed causation of these damages, as well as alleged dental injuries resulting from the accident. Issues included discussion of mechanism of injury and diagnosis of concussion without external trauma.
AUTO ACCIDENT case wherein plaintiff was a
AUTO ACCIDENT case wherein plaintiff was a passenger and claimed to have suffered a concussion with significant and continuing residual effects. Plaintiff’s damage analysis was based on a theory of aggravation of pre-existing SOMATIC SYSTEM DISORDER, (SSD) WHERE SHE GENUINELY BELIEVES SHE SUFFERED A TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY. Plaintiff alleged manifestation of physical symptoms caused by her diagnosed SSD. Also claimed were consequential damages to future career opportunities.
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »