Effective California Mediator
Case Results: Auto Accident
REAR END accident in which plaintiff sustained
REAR END accident in which plaintiff sustained injury to her back. Damages were disputed in that plaintiff claimed a COMPRESSION FRACTURE was causally related to the accident, whereas defendant believed the fracture was not related.
REAR END accident with CERVICAL SPINE injury.
REAR END accident with CERVICAL SPINE injury. Plaintiff was driving for work at the time of the accident, so personal injury claim against the negligent driver also addressed resolution of WORKERS’ COMPENSATION BENEFITS.
Plaintiff sustained injuries to his ELBOW, NECK
Plaintiff sustained injuries to his ELBOW, NECK AND BACK when his truck collided with defendant while she was attempting to make a U-turn and failed to see plaintiff’s truck.
Plaintiff sustained multiple fractures to bones in
Plaintiff sustained multiple fractures to bones in her DOMINANT HAND when her AIR BAGS deployed after Defendant’s truck hit Plaintiff’s car in a controlled intersection.
Plaintiff sustained SHOULDER INJURY as a result
Plaintiff sustained SHOULDER INJURY as a result of car accident in which driver was operating in the COURSE AND SCOPE of his employment. Plaintiff had multiple prior injuries, including a prior surgery to the same shoulder nine months before the accident.
Plaintiff was hit by car in a
Plaintiff was hit by car in a PARKING GARAGE in which he worked as an attendant. Plaintiff brought an action against the management of the garage, claiming that failures in their SECURITY SYSTEM allowed a drunk driver to re enter the garage without detection, and to strike plaintiff causing a serious leg fracture.
Plaintiff was REAR ENDED on highway and
Plaintiff was REAR ENDED on highway and suffered neck injuries resulting in CERVICAL FUSION surgery. Plaintiff had preexisting disc disease but claimed that accident made his neck symptomatic.
Plaintiff was stopped on MOTORCYCLE and was
Plaintiff was stopped on MOTORCYCLE and was pushed off his bike by defendant after a “ROAD RAGE” incident. Plaintiff claimed back and neck injuries from the incident, while defendant contended that most of the injuries were related to pre-existing, degenerative spine conditions. Evaluation and resolution involved discussion of AGGRAVATION OF CONDITION AND TRIGGERING EVENT.
Plaintiff/motorcyclist was INJURED when he was struck
Plaintiff/motorcyclist was INJURED when he was struck by a car while crossing a center left turn lane. Issues centered on which party had the right of way, and how long defendant had occupied the center lane.
MOTORCYCLIST injured by driver while making a
MOTORCYCLIST injured by driver while making a delivery using the UBER platform. Injuries included a FOOT AND ANKLE wound that healed poorly, requiring painful and frequent DEBRIDEMENT procedures to eventually resolve. Other soft tissue injuries and bruises were also sustained.
MULTI CAR FREEWAY ACCIDENT in which defendant
MULTI CAR FREEWAY ACCIDENT in which defendant lost control in heavy weather on highway and crashed into plaintiff’s car. Plaintiff claimed EXACERBATION OF PRE- EXISTING CONDITIONS with injuries to her KNEE and SHOULDER, requiring SURGICAL INTERVENTION.
MULTI VEHICLE high speed accident in which
MULTI VEHICLE high speed accident in which 5 people were seriously injured. Issues centered on whether driver was within COURSE AND SCOPE of his employment at the time of the accident. Also involved substantial INSURANCE COVERAGE issues centering on PERMISSIVE DRIVER status and NON-LISTED VEHICLE EXCLUSION.
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »